Home Work About Articles Let's Talk →
← Back to all work
Quick Commerce · Featured

2-hour delivery platform
across 5 cities

India's first same-day quick commerce supply chain platform — built from 0 to 1. From topology design and warehouse placement to Pick-by-Order, multi-modal dispatch, and Continuous Routing. The infrastructure that powers a 2-hour delivery window at Amazon scale.

57%
Delivery speed
improvement
346M+
Annual orders
fulfilled
25K+
SKUs integrated
into the platform

Amazon's same-day promise was held together with duct tape

When I stepped into this role, the same-day platform was fundamentally fragmented. Grocery lived on a separate surface — customers had to navigate into a completely different store, creating a jarring experience. There was no time-slot flexibility, and warehouse throughput was the daily chokepoint strangling order volume.

The quick commerce opportunity was massive — customers were going to Zepto, Blinkit, and Swiggy Instamart for the speed promise. Amazon had the inventory depth and logistics muscle, but the infrastructure wasn't built to hold the promise. A 2-hour delivery window starts at the warehouse door, not the customer's click.

The problem wasn't one thing to fix. It was a complete rebuild — topology, warehouse operations, last-mile routing, and demand intelligence — all simultaneously.


A full-stack quick commerce engine — six interlocking products

This wasn't a feature sprint. I treated it as a platform initiative across six distinct product workstreams, each feeding into the others:

Key Decision
We had a real debate about whether to build a unified demand planning control tower or let each market operate its forecasting independently. The safe path was independence — faster to ship, lower coordination cost. I pushed for unified, because siloed forecasting creates phantom capacity constraints: market A thinks it's full while market B has headroom. Unified won. The control tower now runs across India, UAE, KSA, and Japan from a single platform — and the 17% forecasting accuracy improvement wouldn't have happened with four separate models.

Grocery integration vs. separate surface — the decision that moved CVR

The biggest strategic call in this entire initiative: integrate grocery directly into the SSD app, or build a separate quick-commerce-specific surface?

The case for separation was compelling: faster to ship, lower technical risk, no cross-team dependency on the main app team, cleaner UX story for the grocery persona.

I argued for integration — and had to fight for it.** The reason: separate surfaces create customer context-switching. A customer browsing Amazon for a phone charger shouldn't have to "go to the grocery app" for milk. That friction is the silent CVR killer. Every app-switch is a lost basket.

We integrated. The result: +18% conversion rate and a double-digit reduction in total shipments per order — because a single basket now ships as a single delivery. Lower cost, lower carbon, better customer experience.


The numbers that came out

Quick Commerce0-to-1 PlatformWMSMMOTTopology DesignMulti-marketAndroidSupply Chain

Other projects from this era

Based in Dubai · Open to select roles